Big Bang Big Bust?
by Brett Roberts
Scientists hold on to the Big Bang theory like a mother gorilla to her dead baby. The emotional attachment is too great to overcome denial.
It has been said that when you come to a conclusion before you have all the facts, that you start to interpret the facts to fit your initial conclusion. I was taught in school that redshift measurements showing that the Universe was expanding, combined with the cosmic microwave background radiation that permeates the Universe in all directions (like a dust cloud from an explosion), meant that a Big Bang started the Universe.
Well, we have better scientific instruments and methods now… and it’s not looking good for the Big Bang theory. I think it’s time to downgrade from “theory” to “hypothesis” or to “wrong.”
Only recently have scientists discovered that the Universe is expanding at an increasing rate, not decreasing. That’s not consistent with an explosion. So… that’s wrong. They’ve also recently discovered that there are huge areas of space that are missing the “dust cloud.” That’s not consistent with an explosion. So… that’s wrong.
Here’s a fun one: It was thought that the Universe was limited in size, because the matter could have only gone so far from the initial point of explosion. Well, each time we expand the vision of the Hubble Space Telescope we find billions more galaxies farther away than we expected. Wow, that makes for some cool photos, but it’s another dagger in the heart of the Big Bang theory.
This one’s even more fun: Scientists use “redshift” to determine the distance from us and the speed at which objects are moving away from us. Well, they recently found a “distant quasar” with a large redshift that is interacting physically with a close galaxy. Wait, so it’s redshift is way larger than the galaxy that’s right next to it? So… it has a significantly larger redshift, but it’s not far away… or moving faster… so… the Universe may not even be expanding at all? Uh……
Scientists are now in the process of an elaborate $6 billion test to mimic the Big Bang at an incredibly small scale by smashing particles together at nearly the speed of light. Their goal is to find the “God Particle” that is missing from their incredibly long, mysterious even to themselves in parts, and arbitrary mathematical formulas which explain the Big Bang. Members of the team admit that if they disprove the existance of this “God Particle” that it may be the most exciting discovery possible… that they’re completely wrong. I have to give them credit for admitting the possibility.
Mother gorilla may hold on to her dead baby for a long time, and even replace him with a human baby she finds in a deserted treehouse, but mother gorilla… your baby is dead. Well, at least perhaps mother gorilla is finally starting to realize it.
Oh, and you can let go of Global Warming now as well. Prophets wrote a long time ago about the increase in calamities in our day. Scientists have only started contemplating after the fact, and their explanations and predictions have been way off even in the short term.
Here’s to the future of science. One where they stop following the cadaver dog with the bad nose, and start a new path towards the truth. Scientists can accomplish some pretty amazing things. They seem too anxious to disprove the existence of God, though, and that’s where they tend to stumble. Perhaps the one thing they will never learn, is that they can’t disprove the existance of the greatest scientist of them all.
Short URL: http://www.narf.tv/?p=345
Posted by
There is one mathematical equation that always seems to be forgotten when “proving” the big bang theory: 0 + 0 = 0 Zero plus Zero equals Zero. Once they disprove this equation then they can continue on with their research. Until then, they are waisting their time.
Any discussion of “The Beginning” must lead to the un-caused cause of all that followed. Something or Someone that existed without causation, independent of a precedent. The Big Bang Theory simply doesn’t meet that standard.
BTW, nice piece of work.
[...] Par des scientifiques Brett Roberts tenir à la théorie du Big Bang comme un gorille mère à son bébé mort. Le lien affectif est trop grand pour surmonter le déni. Il a été dit que quand vous venez à une conclusion avant d'avoir tous les faits, que vous commencez à interpréter les faits pour s'adapter à votre conclusion initiale. [. . . ] URL article original: http://www.narf.tv/2010/02/big-bang-big-bust/ [...]
The Big Bang does not disprove God or the Bible. When the Big Bang theory was first advance by Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Roman Catholic priest. The Darwinist/Naturalist had a fit. They knew that if the universe had a beginning in time and space that it had to have an external cause.
If you are fighting this because of old earth new earth fears. Read some of Huge Ross’ work “the Genesis Question” is a great start.
And by the way if the Universe is ONLY 13 billion years old, as the Big Bang suggests, there is still not enough time for random chance to even have assembled one amino acid. let alone enough to form a simple one celled organism.
Watch Expelled and pay attention to how intellectually bankrupt Dawkins is in his argument against Ben Stien. He finally admits that he could not account for the necessary events needed to start live an earth by random chance. He then puts forth the idea of Alien spermology. The idea that aliens planted the seeds of life on earth and left. Sounds to me like Dawkins is not an atheist; but a Deist.
Don’t fear science it will always prove the Bible and God in the end. We just need honest scientist, and Christians to enter the field confidently. Letting the evidence lead where it may. Darwinist are terrified by this prospect and want to muzzle dissent.
John 18:37 (New International Version)
37″You are a king, then!” said Pilate.
Jesus answered, “You are right in saying I am a king. In fact, for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.”
One day we will all hear the words that GOD spoke from the storm to Job.
Job 38
The LORD Speaks
1 Then the LORD answered Job out of the storm. He said:
2 “Who is this that darkens my counsel
with words without knowledge?
3 Brace yourself like a man;
I will question you,
and you shall answer me.
4 “Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation?
Tell me, if you understand.
5 Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know!
Who stretched a measuring line across it?
6 On what were its footings set,
or who laid its cornerstone-
Could you please provide references to some of the research that you are talking about? I think it would be helpful for me to be able to actually examine some of the research you talk about here. I’m a university student on a secular campus, and people here always want to be able to evalute the facts by themselves, so I would like to provide these to them, so any references you could provide would be helpful.
Man u all r idiots the fact of proving or disproving an abstract concept is imposiible for example cn sm1 prove or disprove the concept of a soul