Comments on: Big Bang Big Bust?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:12:15 +0000

Man u all r idiots the fact of proving or disproving an abstract concept is imposiible for example cn sm1 prove or disprove the concept of a soul

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:20:39 +0000

Could you please provide references to some of the research that you are talking about? I think it would be helpful for me to be able to actually examine some of the research you talk about here. I’m a university student on a secular campus, and people here always want to be able to evalute the facts by themselves, so I would like to provide these to them, so any references you could provide would be helpful.

By: Intellegent Design

Intellegent Design — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:01:12 +0000

The Big Bang does not disprove God or the Bible. When the Big Bang theory was first advance by Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Roman Catholic priest. The Darwinist/Naturalist had a fit. They knew that if the universe had a beginning in time and space that it had to have an external cause.

If you are fighting this because of old earth new earth fears. Read some of Huge Ross’ work “the Genesis Question” is a great start.

And by the way if the Universe is ONLY 13 billion years old, as the Big Bang suggests, there is still not enough time for random chance to even have assembled one amino acid. let alone enough to form a simple one celled organism.

Watch Expelled and pay attention to how intellectually bankrupt Dawkins is in his argument against Ben Stien. He finally admits that he could not account for the necessary events needed to start live an earth by random chance. He then puts forth the idea of Alien spermology. The idea that aliens planted the seeds of life on earth and left. Sounds to me like Dawkins is not an atheist; but a Deist.

Don’t fear science it will always prove the Bible and God in the end. We just need honest scientist, and Christians to enter the field confidently. Letting the evidence lead where it may. Darwinist are terrified by this prospect and want to muzzle dissent.

John 18:37 (New International Version)

37″You are a king, then!” said Pilate.

Jesus answered, “You are right in saying I am a king. In fact, for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.”

One day we will all hear the words that GOD spoke from the storm to Job.

Job 38
The LORD Speaks
1 Then the LORD answered Job out of the storm. He said:

2 “Who is this that darkens my counsel
with words without knowledge?

3 Brace yourself like a man;
I will question you,
and you shall answer me.

4 “Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation?
Tell me, if you understand.

5 Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know!
Who stretched a measuring line across it?

6 On what were its footings set,
or who laid its cornerstone-

By: Buste big big bang?

Buste big big bang? — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:35:50 +0000

[...] Par des scientifiques Brett Roberts tenir à la théorie du Big Bang comme un gorille mère à son bébé mort. Le lien affectif est trop grand pour surmonter le déni. Il a été dit que quand vous venez à une conclusion avant d'avoir tous les faits, que vous commencez à interpréter les faits pour s'adapter à votre conclusion initiale. [. . . ] URL article original: http://www.narf.tv/2010/02/big-bang-big-bust/ [...]

By: hammer

hammer — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:59:12 +0000

Any discussion of “The Beginning” must lead to the un-caused cause of all that followed. Something or Someone that existed without causation, independent of a precedent. The Big Bang Theory simply doesn’t meet that standard.

BTW, nice piece of work.

By: Donnie Fellars

Donnie Fellars — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:16:33 +0000

There is one mathematical equation that always seems to be forgotten when “proving” the big bang theory: 0 + 0 = 0 Zero plus Zero equals Zero. Once they disprove this equation then they can continue on with their research. Until then, they are waisting their time.